ARTnews·Friday, June 5, 2026

Mexico Demands a Halt to an Auction of Mexican Artifacts in Colorado

By Anne Doran

The Mexican Ministry of Culture has demanded the suspension of an auction in Colorado, reports the Latin American news channel TeleSUR. Organized by Artemis Fine Arts in Louisville, Colorado, and scheduled for today, the sale, titled “Fine/Visual Art, Ancient, Ethnographic Art,” includes 80 artifacts of Mexican origin. The works were flagged by Mexico’s federal agency, the National Institute of Anthropology and History (INAH), one of whose roles is to protect the country’s cultural heritage.

“Our heritage is not an object of profit,” Culture Secretary Claudia Curiel de Icaza said. “Its defense is a permanent commitment to the memory and cultural sovereignty of Mexico.”

Under Mexican federal law, artifacts such as the ones on sale today are the property of Mexico, and their export has been prohibited since 1827. In the eyes of Mexican authorities, therefore, any artifacts found outside of Mexico are considered to have been illegal extracted. However, American dealers such as Bob and Teresa Dodge, the owners of Artemis Fine Arts, operate under a variety of U.S. and international laws, including the 1970 UNESCO Convention, codified into U.S. law, which allows for the legal sale of artifacts with a clear provenance.

Since 2018, working under a restitution campaign known as “Mi Patrimonio No Se Vende” (My Heritage Is Not For Sale), the Mexican government has recovered about 16,500 cultural artifacts through diplomatic efforts and legal action, as well as through challenging sales of pre-Columbian and ethnographic pieces at auctions in the U.S and Europe. Artemis has drawn its attention several times in the past, notably in 2024 and 2025; in those cases the Dodges refused to halt the auctions or repatriate any of the items offered.

In 2024, when interviewed by Artnet, Teresa Dodge railed at news reports about repatriation efforts that don’t offer clarity on what is legal to sell. And when asked if critics might not be concerned with the gallery’s sales beyond their legality, her husband told the magazine, “Mexico wants everything back. To what end? Because it’s theirs? When it was made, there was no Mexico.”

This article was originally published by ARTnews.

Read full article at ARTnews
More News
ARTnewsJun 6
Sotheby’s Quietly Tried to Sell Arne Glimcher’s Pollock for $50 M.—It Didn’t Go as Planned
Galerie MagazineJun 5
Crystal Bridges Unveils a Monumental Expansion by Moshe Safdie
DesignboomJun 5
line+ embeds a cluster of sculptural roofed volumes within red-earth valley in china
HyperallergicJun 5
Jamie Nares’s Enduring Romance With the Brushstroke
ARTnewsJun 5
National Park Service Orders Removal of Quotes at Bunker Hill After Visitor Complains of ‘Woke’ Ideology
The Art NewspaperJun 5
Remembering Julio Le Parc, a pioneer of kinetic art
© 2026 WattsOS